By Rabbi Josh Wander
There is a scene in the Torah that feels almost uncomfortably contemporary.
Sdom is about to be destroyed. The decree is sealed. The angels are standing inside Lot’s home telling him to leave.
And he hesitates.
Rashi explains that he lingered because of his wealth. He was calculating what he would lose. His holdings. His assets. His financial security. A city moments away from annihilation, and he is thinking about liquidity.
It’s easy to shake our heads at Lot. It’s harder to admit how much we resemble him.
For nearly eighty years, something unprecedented has existed in Jewish history: a sovereign Jewish state in Eretz Yisrael with open gates. An army. A functioning economy. Infrastructure. An airport with daily departures. Organizations like Nefesh B’Nefesh guiding Jews through the process. Flights on El Al ready to carry families home.
This is not mystical abstraction. It is operational reality. And yet millions remain comfortably in exile.
Chazal tell us that during Yetziat Mitzrayim, only a minority left. The Midrash famously teaches that 80% of the Jews remained in Egypt, unwilling to abandon the familiarity of their environment. Slavery was brutal, but it was structured. Predictable. The desert was unknown.
Sometimes bondage feels safer than freedom.
Persian Jews have their carpet businesses, their silversmith shops, their intergenerational trades woven into the bazaars. American Jews have their nursing homes, their diamond exchanges, their law firms, their portfolios. Entire communal identities built around industries that became pathways to success.
Different continents. Same psychology.
We tell ourselves: this is how we survive. This is how we secure our children’s future. This is where our sustenance comes from.
But the Torah has already dismantled that illusion.
Lot wasn’t denying danger. He wasn’t philosophically confused. He simply could not detach from the machinery of his parnassah. He confused the vessel with the source.
We speak fluently about bitachon. We declare that Hashem sustains all living beings. We teach that parnassah is decreed from Above. Yet when geography enters the conversation, our faith tightens.
“Yes, Hashem provides… but salaries are higher here.”
“Yes, Hashem provides… but the market is stronger here.”
“Yes, Hashem provides… but my investments perform better in this country.”
At some point, intellectual honesty demands the question: do we believe our sustenance comes from carpets and diamonds, from nursing homes and stock exchanges, or from the Ribbono Shel Olam?
Hishtadlus is real. The Torah never endorses passivity. You work. You build. You calculate responsibly. But hishtadlus is the vessel, not the source. Vessels crack. Markets implode. Regimes shift. Industries evaporate. Jewish history is filled with once-dominant professions that disappeared overnight.
Exile trains us to anchor security in environment. Redemption demands anchoring security in Hashem.
There is another brutal pattern we rarely acknowledge: we almost always figure it out too late.
Before revolutions, there are speeches. Before expulsions, there are warnings. Before borders close, there are rumors. There is always one more school year to finish. One more promotion. One more reason to postpone.
Windows in Jewish history do not close gradually. They slam.
For nearly eighty years, the gates of Eretz Yisrael have been open in a way they were not for two millennia. No angels dragging us. No sealed borders forcing urgency. Just an open invitation.
That kind of patience from Heaven should not be mistaken for permanence.
When we daven for Jews in places like Iran, we should do so with full hearts. They are ours. Their vulnerability is ours. But we should also hear the echo. The same comfort that keeps Jews rooted in Tehran is the comfort that keeps Jews rooted in Manhattan.
Slavery can feel stable. Exile can feel sophisticated. Bondage can masquerade as success.
The question is not whether Hashem can provide parnassah in Eretz Yisrael.
The question is whether we trust Him enough to step into the unknown before the known collapses.
Eighty percent once chose the familiarity of Egypt over the uncertainty of redemption.
History does not linger over their grandchildren.
Hashem has opened a window. No one knows how long it will remain open.
The real risk may not be leaving behind a familiar trade. The real risk may be assuming the illusion will last forever.

